Oh, poor you.

I have opinions on lots of the topics brought up in this post, but I'll restrict my comments to this:

The above discussion only serves to call into question the rationale of the OP's original point: conservative voices are drowned out by a sea of moderates and liberals in the vast datastream that is the internet. What I've seen here over the last 7 pages of posts is a mix of viewpoints, at least as many conservative as liberal.

Well the same applies to you. You insinuated that the reason that North Korea made advances in it's nuclear program was because Clinton sold American nuclear secrets to the DPRK. I posted the fas.org article on the subject.

So who would you rather I believe, the Federation of American Scientists who actually research their material ( as dated as it seems sometimes ) or someone posting on a bulletin board moaning *OMG LIBERALS ARE TEH EVIL LOOK AT WHAT CLINTON DID* and not backing it up?

True, but look to many other forums.  I bet you will find the ration in favor of the liberal voice and i don't mean per forum but on the web as a whole.  I web has a liberal tone to it.  I would expect this anyhow because it in its nature to be liberal.  I think a conservative internet would grow slower and be geared less towards the youth and entertainment.  I also feel that a conservative internet would more be more structure and more governed (which is contrast to conservative view of hands off).  So yes the internet is liberal, but I think it needs to be.  Think about the people who built it in the first place.  I seriously doubt it was a bunch of Nixon cheerleaders.

So far the only thing you are refuting in my posting as been of what I said about Clinton, what about everything else ive stated? Or are you going to play to that liberal stereotype where you just ignore everything said and try to change the subject at hand, which If im not mistaken was about ID being a Conservative on the Liberal Internet and not what Clinton may or may not have done to earn himself some easy coin.

If you'd scrolled through the other messages, you'd have discovered that this is a fictitious satire piece not an accurate article about Obama or his position.  There's nothing to fear except the ignorant reposting satire and op-ed pieces as facts...ahem.

Nicely dodged there...by adding the "20th century" part you convenient dodge the new king of Worst President EVER, which we all know is GW. 

You mean the same people who got tax cuts under Bush?  The same ones that DIDN'T help our economy over the past 8 years as he DOUBLED the national deficit etc.?  Bush made every dollar YOU made worth 1/2 as much as it did in 2000.  So, in exchange for a chump change tax cut, you lost 1/2 your REAL worth...and that was BEFORE the events of the last two months.

Maybe if certain people hadn't been so damned greedy and selfish, they might all be worth a hell of a lot more today. I know a LOT of businessmen who are penny-wise and pound foolish.

Either way, I've seen the math, and when you look at the NET numbers, we're talking chump change here UNLESS you are making REAL money and then you will pay FRACTIONALLY more under Obama than Bushco.

So bloody what?  YOU can afford it.  You know you can. 

And if it helps SAVE the economic engine that actually drives consumer spending in this country, re: the ravaged Middle Class under Bushco, then EVERY small business owner will see more REVENUE from those people because they will have more money to SPEND on their products and services.

So you get to make more money, and pay a little more in taxes.  NET you will be ahead in PROFIT under a better managed economy.  Every businessman should understand THAT logic.

This country made your success possible.  Eat the extra % and thank god for it...all the way to the bank.

BIG assumption there, Ex.  Care to expound on your business experience?  I'm asking that seriously, since I'd like to understand the prism through which you are viewing this issue.

Sort of like my patriotic duty?  That kind of 'afford it'?

actually there are a few others that will continue with that title...  read your history, just because the far left gives him that title doesn't mean you should.  And that title is only given to him to help you sway your vote to the left.  

 and if you scrolled down you will see where i was corrected... right back at ya.

The business owners, employers and producers had nothing to do with this down turn.  First if you all remember, months before Bush took office the American economy was taking a nose dive.  Even before 9/11 the airline industries were hurting.  The Dot.com bubble popped long before Bush announced his candidacy.  You have to think and realize the American economy exploded with the rise of dot.com and we rode it well and then boom. It was over!  Surely you don’t we wouldn’t suffer any repercussions from it, would you?

And check out ID’s post about the article he found regarding the Clinton administration working with Frannie and Freddie.  And also the idea of blaming this mess on one man is just appalling and really shows ones ignorance. 

Could be. The worse thing he did was to make it damn near impossible for the republicans to win this election