I find this to be an interesting story, and from the beginning I knew there was something else going on aside from just a so-called community center going in near ground zero.

Link

Follow the Shariah Index Project to solve the puzzle of the 6 mystery floors: We found two hidden websites with  copiously deleted information, all about the Imam’s Cordoba Institute Shariah Index Project.  For reference, here’s the Imam’s most recent hidden website (also available here as a pdf).  And here’s the Imam’s earlierhidden website (also available here as a pdf).  The information on those websites – information that the Imam tried to hide with a new whitewashed version – suggests that the six mystery floors of the Ground Zero Mosque will be dedicated to the Imam’s long-term goal: the Shariah Index Project, designed to benchmark Shariah compliance, to distribute Shariah propaganda, and to enforce Shariah law in America and worldwide.

Drawing from those hidden webpages and other sites, we’ve constructed a timeline for the Shariah Index Project and a partial list of Rauf’s partners in the Project.  In Part 2, we’ll reveal the disturbing background and views of those partners.  And in Part 3, we’ll present the bottom line – how this all ties together as a historic Islamist effort to market and to enforce Shariah in America, starting from Ground Zero.

As usual we have to rely on bloggers to investigate.  The mainstream media is too busy labeling everyone has racists to help support their democrat allies.


Comments (Page 10)
10 PagesFirst 8 9 10 
on Aug 30, 2010

I see the discussion has swerved into the topic of private interpretation of the Holy Bible and so I'll jump in the fray but promise not to belabor the point. 

KFC posts:

We are living in a time of the warm fuzzies. Everyone has their own interpretation of what that is and that's what they based their decisions/opinions on.

Yes, that and moral relativism.

Milonas posts 131

I'm glad to see you admit that everyone has their own interpretation. Maybe we could extent that into the theological realm?

KFC posts:

As far as the theological realm goes, there is only ONE interpretation of the bible. It's own. The bible interprets itself.

You are deluding yourself if you believe that the Bible interprets itself.

If what you claim was true, then the Ethiopian in Acts 8: 26-40 would have known and understood what he was reading in Isaias, but he didn't and asked Philip to explain what it meant. The Holy Bible itself states in no uncertain terms that "no prophecy of scripture is made by private interpretation.". 2Peter 1:20.

And if that's not enough, then here's a quote from a former Presbyterian minister, Marcus C. Grodi.

"Each Sunday from my Protestant pulpit, I proclaimed from Scripture the doctrines of my particular Protestant denomination. Across the street and around the corner other ministers of other denominations also preached from the same Bible and yet proclaimed different doctrines. Each of us believed that what we were teaching was essential and clearly based on Scripture, yet more often than we realized, in the privacy of our individual churches, what we preached contradicted one another." 

Protestantism has no way of resolving these denominational dichotomies; they will continue to split and justify their split based upon their own private reading and appeals to the Bible.  Protestantism doesn't do as the Ethiopian did and ask an authentic interpreter of Scripture what it means, and has ended up with de facto doctrinal relativism.  

The ancient Jews had authoritative teachers of Scripture and after Christ, Christians have an authoritative teacher..."the Church" which the Bible calls "the pillar and ground of truth".

 

 

 

on Aug 30, 2010

I see the discussion has swerved into the topic of private interpretation of the Holy Bible and so I'll jump in the fray but promise not to belabor the point.

 but just enough to contradict me (by jumping into a conversation between me and Luke) even tho we've discussed this countless of times you and I.  You just can't help yourself can you Lula?   You just don't get it nor do you want to.  This is nothing more than RCC proselytizing once again.  I'm not even going to bother refuting your false claim because been there, done that already.

 

on Aug 31, 2010

Humbordt
 
you can be dead serious. You have the RIGHT to move about the country as you see fit. It is part of the right of freedom. By denying you that right, they are taking away your freedom.
That's the point I was making (that no degree is acceptable--I seem to recall somebody saying that), but I really can't honestly say I get all that indignant when things like that happen.


Humbordt, you mean I can agrue for something that I am totally against and no one will know! Also, some people may feel that they are changing the world by changing one person's view. Heck, with one less person that only leaves 6,864,826,224 more to go.
I'm not arguing something I'm totally against (although, yes, you can do that), I'm just not as passionate about it as I may have let on. It causes me more eye-rolling than righteous anger.

And Dan's not trying to change anybody's mind, he's lashing out (if he is trying to change minds, he's going about it in a highly questionable manner). And I don't believe I could change his mind even if I wanted to. He's not here to exchange ideas, he's here to scream in people's face. I'll play with him for as long as I feel like doing it, but nothing I (or anybody else) has to say is going to change him. He'll either let go of all that hate one day or he won't.

And Dan, I realize I'm talking behind your back here (well, sorta-kinda), but I still love ya, man!

Humbordt, I just found this and just wanted to clearify that I wasn't saying that you were agruing for something you that you totally didn't believe I was just saying that I have on the internet a lot of people that just want to agrue for the sacking of agruing. 

I am sorry for making it seem that was intended at you but it was intended for the person you were going round for round.  Hopefully you'll still read this.

RCC, the original church, giggles........ Jesus is the word, well....nevermind, this article is not about either of those points and don't feel like hijacking an article into another topic.

10 PagesFirst 8 9 10