Stardock is indie?

Looking at the game on that monitor, how come i get the feeling its Starcraft 2?

Haha... I always assumed Frogboy had his bees out at his own place, not at the office.

I can just imagine some fresh meat showing up at the company for his/her first workday. Frogboy stands looming eerily at the entrance. "Welcome", he cackles, "let me introduce you to my beeeeeeeeeeeees....". And before long: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4MqTCIDKhU 

Great article. lol some places are clean and others... we don't talk about them (hazardous materials).

Stardock- Been there and plan so again next summer. Maybe a closer look at those bees this time.

heh - i think one of his old demigod dev journals had a video of the hives and him playing with some bees in the building too. 

Anyway, congrats on some more good press!

Nice to see some old friends in the pictures. I know most of the Supercell guys from the days when I worked at Digital Chocolate. The other two studios I've worked at don't exist anymore. I hope that's coincidence, not an effect I've had

The article is slightly outdated already, though. Supercell just moved to a larger office.

I'm still stoked about the huge bag of swedish fish I spied in that first picture!!! Yumm!!!

The picture with the cat is my desk

Bara

Personally, I prefer YoYoGames (http://sandbox.yoyogames.com/) and if you love 3D retro games more than most modern super 3D graphics games you should probably agree.

Can't speak for anybody else, but it's always seemed to me that if some head developer sits around afterhours discussing the latest game session they've had with their friends, chances are they're indie.  If the head developer sits around afterhours discussing how well their stocks are doing with their friends, they're Game Industry.

Of course, this is just a quick and dirty method of evaluation, but as good as any other.

Where does Valve fit in? They aren't publicly traded, but I doubt anyone would call them indie...

Bara

True, but the stocks they discuss don't have to be their company's.  Just their portfolios. 

It's a question of what one values in a workplace situation.  A friend of mine worked for a few years for Origin Systems both in its pre-EA days and a year afterwards.  He said that their were staff around all the time, including in the dead of night, playing games and chatting.  The atmosphere was relaxed, and congenial.  When EA took over, the administrative mindset changed.  Goal end dates, which had been flexible, became fixed.  Mandatory classes began in work ethic.  The executives knew nothing about the games; they were a separate tier of managers, as in much industry, who saw employees in terms of resources, only.

I'm not suggesting that one system is necessarily better than the other.  But av various companies have shown (Z Theory management, and all that crap), when management share a common knowledge base and drive with other employees whom they manage, channels of communication remain open, morale remains higher, and more creative work gets done.

I'm getting too near mounting a soapbox.  Best let it go at that.