Neoseeker.com has published their review of Elemental: War of Magic!

Elemental: War of Magic is an essential purchase, one easy to recommend because it's relevant to so many different types of gamers: strategy fans, RPG nuts, newbies, veterans -- it doesn't matter. Pardon the pun, but it's got all the elements of the classics you know and love -- fans of Master of Magic, the Ogre Battle series, the Heroes of Might & Magic series, and so on should find lots to love here, and find that Elemental earns itself a top spot on your game shelf. And with Stardock's committment to the game (they're dedicating a year exclusively to updates and new content for it), you can be assured it will become a classic of its own.

Neoseeker gives Elemental a 9/10, and Editor’s Choice!  Read the full review at Neoseeker.

editor_choice


Comments (Page 1)
7 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Aug 30, 2010

Dang...I certainly didn't expect a review like that after last week! Joy += 2

on Aug 30, 2010

I don't know what the guy smoked to write this.

I give Elemental 6/10 now.

 

on Aug 30, 2010

I am glad that EWOM got a good review - it deserves it.   The best game to hit the PC for many years.

on Aug 30, 2010

A bit unexpected but nice! A boost of positivity doesn't hurt.

More fuel to the engine

on Aug 30, 2010

 Look I know the game needs work but I am on a Vista 32b system\W GTX480  and have had very little problems, sound problems with combat after playing for 2hrs, and also 1 crash after playing for 4hr+, and once  or twice lock up during battle and Auto combat was the only way out, but I still love this game!!!!

on Aug 30, 2010

EWOM is a brilliant game with a few serious bugs that should be fixed within a few weeks if not sooner.  This review gives me hope that EWOM's release will not hurt Stardock as a company.

on Aug 30, 2010

xaltotun
The best game to hit the PC for many years.

What the hell? Off the top of my head: starcraft 2, mass effect 2, dragon age, dawn of war 2 + expansion, resident evil 5, company of heroes, half life 2, portal, tropico 3, torchlight, fallout 3, GTA 4, left 4 dead 2, borderlands, hell even alpha protocol have all proven to be more enjoyable experiences than what Elemental has has to offer so far.

 

on Aug 30, 2010

Hm, either Brad has some useful contacts in the reviewing industry or this guy has really been smoking ...  

Accessible? So that's the reason for the urgent tutorial being added ...

No Tactical Battles are not "great fun" yet. "Cleverness will get you everywhere, here."   (see the numerous threads on first strike etc).

 

What is more annoying although understandable is that I happened to notice that at least another offical review was blasted from the forum recently. That one was like 3 out of 10 and, unfortunately, not polite at all. 

Well, the game will get much better ... 

on Aug 30, 2010

We cannot recruit mages as units! He hasn't played the game!! (sorry, but I had to say that! )

No comments on Dynasty, wonder why. Congrats anyway, Stardock.

on Aug 30, 2010

This review, again, leaves me confused.  Are all of us playing the same game?

 

I see bug reports about crashes (I have 2 current BIG crashes going on: Out of Memory; and another that randomly just "has stopped responding" the game) yet any mention of the crashes in the forums has people screaming that THEY don't have crashes, so to shut up.

 

I see complaints about slowdowns (after about an hour or two of playing my framerate in game drops so far that when I click the "big" box on the right hand side to expand and see the "little" boxes about what city improvements are built I can probably hand-draw the lil' boxes and their contents by the time they appear, and autocalcing battles means I sit there and watch my Sovereign  step up to the baddies, slowly swing, then sit there for 15 seconds or so while waiting for the autocalc box to pop up and I know if I won or lost ... yet, others are shouting the game runs perfectly smooth and complaints of slowdowns are false/wrong/whathaveyou.

 

I see complaints that the AI is too docile, even at higher difficulty, and makes silly decisions (I'm currently playing on Challenging, small map to try and force the AI to fight, and it just stands around (literally the Sovereign was standing next to his town, which I just took, with an army that could potentially beat me and did not attack .. so I LEFT, and left the town empty, and he stood there and did nothing for many turns before I killed him and defeated his faction) , or it just walks in circles in strategic map, and in combat it chases 1 unit of mine, leading to easy-kite-victories) ... yet ... posts about AI problems get shouted down ... or worse, people claim the AI is "too hard."

 

I see posts about maps being devoid of resources, and others about there being so many its too crowded (I have had both experiences in different patch versions).

 

Now I see reviews that are negative, listing some aspects of the game erroneously, and using concept screenshots that aren't actually from the game being reviewed - but pointing out some actual negative points I have experienced.  Also, I see a wonderfully positive review ... which seems to use proper screenshots, but still mentions things in a way that makes me think "what the heck was this person playing ... no bugs? .. good balance? .. etc?"

 

 

... are ALL the reviews of EWoM randomly generated?  ... are they all fabricated? ... is there some weird, "Liberal-vs-Conservative" style fight going on, where each side has their own stash of "facts" and never the two shall meet?

 

Did half of us get one copy of the game with bugs and weird features not working, and the other half got the "fun" copy? ... is this all an elaborate social experiment?  You give some of us a placebo copy of the game, and others get the working one? LOL

 

 

I'd go back to playing, but my current game (the fourth one to fall apart on me) has slowed down so much it takes too long for me to finish a turn ... and it just crashed badly ... so I figured I'd pop in here to look around, and I leave here confused every time.

on Aug 30, 2010

I have no major issues with the game at all.  I get a slow down as the game goes on...im at turn 200 right now, but other than that its a blast.  I would give it a 9/10 as well, but like I have stated, I dont have the crashes others do, so why would I hold that against them.  My gripes are small things...like caravans destroying my improvements when I go to war with their owners lol.  Sneaky merchants!!  You guys deserve the praise and everyone should know by now...this is Stardock...they wont leave us hanging!!

on Aug 30, 2010

Wintersong
We cannot recruit mages as units! He hasn't played the game!! (sorry, but I had to say that! )

No comments on Dynasty, wonder why. Congrats anyway, Stardock.

 

ACTUALLY .. just noticed .. that review is from Wednesday, September 1st.

 

So ... maybe I don't agree with it because its from the FUTURE ... two days in my future actually ... there is nowhere on the Earth currently that can be Wednesday the 1st of September (New Zealand being the first timezone, and it is still Tuesday the 31st there, morning).

 

Obviously the reviewer was playing a FUTURE patch of the game ... with much of the issues fixed.  HURRAY!!!  Everything will be 9/10 in two days!

on Aug 30, 2010

Sinful01
I see bug reports about crashes (I have 2 current BIG crashes going on: Out of Memory; and another that randomly just "has stopped responding" the game) yet any mention of the crashes in the forums has people screaming that THEY don't have crashes, so to shut up.

Crashes are system-specific. So yeah, some people have them, some people don't. I've played the game on several different machines - on my main desktop it crashes on startup (ATI Radeon HD48xx card) , on my other desktop with GeForce somethingicantremember it runs with no crashes, no OOMs, and almost no slowdowns. On my notebook with GeForce G102M it runs w/out crashes as well, altho I lowered settings to avoid slowdowns.

 

on Aug 30, 2010

The reviewer was in the beta of the game and as such is probably very familiar with the still continuing progress and with the passion, work ethic and standards of Stardock. In light of this, the game was likely reviewed by its potential and expected evolution, i.e. reviewed as the game it will be rather than the game it currently is.

In that regard, I agree with the general tone and impressions given in the review, as I trust Stardock to follow through completely.

Lastly, although it appears the release was somewhat premature, I believe that the majority are thankful that it was released now rather than February next year, despite any teething issues.

on Aug 30, 2010

kudos on the praise... i'm one of the ones who have had < 3 CTDs in the last week, so i honestly have nothing but praise for EWoM...

my only real gripe (other than the balance tweaks, and improvements to the tech tree and magic system *grins*) is with the "end game" slow.... churn....... of............. death.....................

 

oh, and for what its worth, PCGamer has revised their opinion for Elemental... http://www.pcgamer.com/2010/08/27/elemental-now-works-old-savegames-now-dont/

Elemental: War of Magic was updated to version 1.06 this morning (UK time), and I’m happy to say the game is finally stable. I haven’t encountered any crashes to desktop since the patch Tuesday night, and the last major issue with the game on our systems is finally fixed.

7 Pages1 2 3  Last