I noted the grounds for the suit.  Not a word about racial profiling.  I guess the lawyers for Calderon wasted all their time.

I would guess some of the regime got around to reading the bill. 

Perhaps Obama is aspiring to be the VP of Mexico under Calderone after his one miserable, failed term in America is over.

Have you ever seen an African-Mexican politician?  Just wonderin'.

I'll take this seriously when the Feds sue San Francisco for their sanctuary ordinances.

The Mexicans are poor, not stupid.

That one does tend to puzzle: Cities ignore federal law and get a pass. A state puts the weight of its law behind the federal law and gets sued.

How many people would sue a person trying to help you do your job? Obama and his cronies it appears. I sure hope sane Democrats start to wake up. There has to be some that can see past party ideology and tell right from wrong. It's going to take more than just those in Arizona.

I see another 5-4 vote coming. Obama must know this as well. It could be an "oh, well WE tried" trick on Hispanic voters (at least the ones and others that don't support the AZ law) to vote grab. Seem the government will spare no taxpayer cost to garner votes for its own purpose.

You have to remember who is running the insane asylum. Hint:  It is not the doctors anymore.

In what should be a 9-0 one.  But then no one said you had to be intelligent to be on SCOTUS.

I think our president wants to become president of the North American Union.  It'll certainly extend his term.

RC it can appear that way. Even if this president and his minions were able to wipe out conservatism completely (which would be impossible), he would still have to deal with a diverse coalition that, while for now might see conservatives/capitalism as the enemy, would begin in-fighting the moment they won. These differences would magnify themselves very quickly. We can see small examples of it now... a Congressional majority that can't get their entire agenda passed through with ease. 

Anyone find it interesting how they are going after Arizona for their immigration law when Missouri has had essentially the same law for about 5 years?  Let's also mention Nebraska passing their law against illegal immigration.  No, lawsuits against them.  Hmmm, one has to wonder.

Lets also mention that they are suing AZ for allegedly usurping Federal power (not racial profiling as mentioned in the thread).  To spite AZ I heard that they defunded ICE in AZ preventing them from doing what little of their job they WERE doing. 

That's like an unproductive union worker going on strike while the Union sues the company for hiring someone to do the work of the unproductive worker. Oy vey even writing this makes my head spin. 

I gotta go lay down now.

One county here in the Old Dominion has had the same essential law for the last 3 years.  And no one has mounted any type of successful challenge to it (they have threatened, but never brought it to court).

One things for sure, they don't care about the opinion of the people... just 28% approve. 

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/56_oppose_justice_department_challenge_of_arizona_law_61_favor_similar_law_in_their_state

And get a load of this... Taliban John's lawyer is handling the case for the Holder Justice Dept.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/08/ex-terror-lawyer-lead-arizona-immigration-law/

Since when do they care?

Health Care - 60-34 against

Immigration - 56-28 Against

Tax Increases - 62-23 against

Kagan - 46-34 against (well at least they get close on that one).

That's only because there is so little information on her and people are believing her lies and allowing Dems to whitewash all the dirt.