Published on December 28, 2009 By Island Dog In Current Events

In case you didn't hear, an islamic Nigerian man tried to "blow up" a Detroit bound airliner on Christmas Day.  Fortunately, nobody but the terrorist was hurt and he is currently being held by American officials.

In my opinion, this was just a test-run by a moron follower just to test the system.  Something big is coming without a doubt.

Here are some interesting things about this story:

Yes, you read that correctly.  Two of the leaders were released from Gitmo, into a "art therapy rehabilitation program".  You can't make this stuff up.  Will people who want to close Gitmo realize that these people are dangerous, and they always will be?

 

 

 


Comments (Page 6)
6 PagesFirst 4 5 6 
on Jan 05, 2010

Yeah, Bush wasn't all that palatable for a second term, but he was far better than Kerry.

on Jan 06, 2010

Yeah, Bush wasn't all that palatable for a second term, but he was far better than Kerry.

I am a bit older than most around here, and have now voted in 9 presidential elections.  Of those 9 votes, I have voted enthusiastically for a candidate 3 times (33%).  84, 88 and 2000.  The rest I settled. 

I will say that my vote in 80 was a settled one, but looking back, I am glad I voted for Reagan in 80 (this of course was offset by the Bush 41 betrayal after 88).  I was young and foolish so believed some of the MSM lies at the time about him.

That was the last time I thought of the MSM and integrity in the same sentence.

on Jan 13, 2010

I am a bit older than most around here, and have now voted in 9 presidential elections.  Of those 9 votes, I have voted enthusiastically for a candidate 3 times (33%).  84, 88 and 2000.  The rest I settled.

I was never able to vote for any of these, but here's a list of whom I would have voted for in my life time, given what I knew in 2000 and learned later:

80: Reagan (I hate Carter)

84: Reagan (I like Reagan)

88: Bush I (I like Reagan)

92: Clinton (I like the Clintons)

96: Clinton (I like the Clintons)

00: Gore (I like the Clintons and Al Gore was a decent chap back then)

04: Bush (I was proven wrong about him)

08: McCain (although ideally paired with Lieberman)

 

I think it can easily be seen that my position is neither conservative nor liberal as such but simply based on centrism plus radical anti-communism plus support for the military and Israel.

What isn't clear above (some might say especially because of Clinton) is that I usually also care about the lifestyle of the politicians I support. I prefer politicians who are themselves fairly conservative and religiously somewhat observant but advocate a completely secular state nonetheless. George W. Bush was, with a few minor exceptions, a good example of what I like (and so was McCain).

I also take into account the enemies a politician has. Again, George W. Bush profitted here (as did the Clintons and Al Gore though).

 

In 2012 I will likely support, in order of my preference:

1. Any pro-Israel Mormon running as a Republican

2. Any pro-Israel Jew running as a Democrat

3. Hillary Clinton

 

 

 

on Jan 13, 2010

00: Gore (I like the Clintons and Al Gore was a decent chap back then)

Gore wrote "earth in the Balance" in 1990.  He was not a decent chap even then.

on Jan 13, 2010

Gore wrote "earth in the Balance" in 1990. He was not a decent chap even then.

After creating the Internet, he knew his money would be in GW. We would have had cap and trade in 2001.

6 PagesFirst 4 5 6