After upgrading my desktop PC, another good result is I have a ton of spare parts laying around.  Enough for two complete PC’s actually, so I thought it might be fun to build a test system for Windows Home Server.  I have always wanted to have a home server going, but I wanted to test it first before committing to it.

I took a Celeron D in a MicroATX Gigabyte motherboard, about 1GB of RAM, and put it in a spare PC case.  I loaded up WHS and got it installed fairly quickly.  The only issue I had was getting it to recognize the LAN drivers.  I eventually had to download some from Intel and transfer them over via a USB drive.  After that, everything was smooth.

The Home Server Console which is installed on your client PC’s is pretty slick.  It has a user-friendly UI and can be extended using community add-ins.  One such add-in is a power management system to where I can set the WHS box to hibernate and wake at certain times each day to save power.

6-13-2009 7-13-20 PM6-13-2009 7-13-40 PM

The Console installation on other PC’s was quick, and gives you access to the shared folders on the network.  It’s pretty handy to have all your files, including media such as music and videos, in a central location that you can access virtually anywhere in your home, or via the internet if you choose.  The next feature I need to try is the backing up of the PC’s on the network, which really could be worth the time to build the WHS box.

6-13-2009 7-18-22 PM 6-13-2009 7-18-49 PM

So my initial impressions are pretty favorable.  The easy setup is a big plus, and is much simpler than trying to connect all your PC’s via one desktop.  I will continue to check it out and give some more impressions later.


Comments
on Jun 14, 2009

Windows Classic FTW... jeez- so much wasted space ... blurs make my eyes ache... gaaahhh...

DrGonzo

on Jun 14, 2009

island dog, I will fire the first shot in the my server is bigger than yours 'war'.

I have a SMALL server in my home ( p4 2180 512mb ram gb lan 4x1tb hdds in mirror array ie 2tb available space, and only 570gb free space left, and I can still add 2 more hdds  for future expansion, but I am using a linux fileserver distro called SME server, and have a top transfer speed of 50mb/sec from my pc's, and I do have a GB lan with cat 7 stp wiring

harpo

 

on Jun 14, 2009

Question, I haven't really researched home server much, but it does look like an interesting proposition. Do/Can you actually set it up using domains etc like you might find on a work or school network? Like where all your login/user data is handled via the server rather than the individual machine & all your files save to the server unless you manually choose otherwise?

on Jun 15, 2009

That's a good question.  I know you can setup your own domain for remote access and things like that, but I will have to read more about it.

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/windowshomeserver/connect.mspx

 

on Jun 15, 2009

I have a home server for 12 years now. Nowadays I store all my documents in Subversion rather than via NFS or SMB. This works really, since it not only solves the issue of having your documents in one place, but also the "laptop synchronisation" problem, you do a checkout on your laptop, work on it on the road and check in your modifications later.

What are the advantages/disadvantages of Windows Home Server compared to a Linux home server?

on Jun 15, 2009

What are the advantages/disadvantages of Windows Home Server compared to a Linux home server?


Ease of configuration. What's the old adage? "Linux is only free if your time is worth nothing."

DrGonzo

on Jun 15, 2009

[quote who="Dr.Gonzo" reply="6" id="2261118"]
What are the advantages/disadvantages of Windows Home Server compared to a Linux home server?

Ease of configuration. What's the old adage? "Linux is only free if your time is worth nothing."

DrGonzo[/quote]

 

The first time I installed my Fedora Core 7.9 server after install was complete it took me less than one hour to figure out how to get it going. Its really not that hard anymore with all the online guides ...

Island Dog, glad to see youre setting up your own server ... I was always curious about having a Windows Server - I set a few up in school but never really used them properly.

I got my Fedora backup and running recently and am developing my own file upload\management software via PHP\MySQL. Seems to be working out pretty good thus far ...

on Jun 15, 2009

What are the advantages/disadvantages of Windows Home Server compared to a Linux home server?

Ease of configuration. What's the old adage? "Linux is only free if your time is worth nothing."

DrGonzo

Let's not turn this thread into a religion one. Setting up a few shares for Windows client machines is both a few mouse clicks on Windows & Linux. Advantages/disadvantages please. I.e. things like platform X has better internet connection sharing because....

on Jun 16, 2009

Let's not turn this thread into a religion one

Not a Windows zealot- used Linux to serve for years... probelms arrive when you want to deviate at all from a cut-and-paste vanilla setup... Yes there are online read-mes for how to do anything with Linux. Problem is, there's 230785275987230987349872 [slight exaggeration] different ways to do it, they change with every x.0.1 release and everyone, it seems, wants to do it differently--

Used it for years, got sick of the headache every time I wanted to change something simple-- went WinServer, haven't looked back.

DrGonzo

on Jun 16, 2009

i tested out home server as well about a month ago.  i liked the UI.  it was speedy, even on the virtual machine.  i was able to connect it to the 360 and do a bunch of kinda neat things.  but when it came down to it, i really dont need it.  it would cost cash for the PC, cash for the software, cash for the power to run it, cash for the power to cool the house down, etc etc.  but if you are looking for a big budget solution for media streaming and storage in your home it works very well.

on Jun 17, 2009

it would cost cash for the PC, cash for the software, cash for the power to run it, cash for the power to cool the house down, etc etc. but if you are looking for a big budget solution for media streaming and storage in your home it works very well.

That's a bit extreme.  I'm constructing mine from spare parts, it's low power so it doesn't cost much to run, and there are add-ins to make it hibernate to save even more power.

on Jun 17, 2009

 i know this is straying a bit, but i want you to  know my reasoning...

i ran a server for file print backup and web in house for years.  i used it as a game server as well hosting CS and Freelancer.  Once I moved away from the games i still used it for the more classic reasons.  this was a low profile dell 500Mhz PIII with a bunch of RAM and a couple of HDDs.  Since I like to run my secondary systems faceless and we store everything on the server that sucker was running constantly.  even with the power settings set to run cool and sleep, wake on lan, etc, it was always running.  think about it.  its used all day, then at night, its running AV scans and backups.  then its morning. (btw, i retired it and gave it to a church, thing still runs solid every day.)

when we replaced our desktops, the server became nearly 100% obsolete.  the new desktops had more HDD space than all the drives combined in the server.  i moved some of the hardware around.  dumped my largest IDE drive into an external enclosure.  this is now our backup disk.  wifey's computer has the main document share.  her second HDD has media for streaming to the xbox360.  my PC has remote connectivity via RDP.  my second HDD hold ISO images for games, and kiddos edu progs.

all the rest of my old junk was retired or given away.  around our computers we have a noticable difference in temp from when the old systems were in place.  maybe up to 5 degrees.  now instead of 2-3 constantly running computers, we have 1.  thats a lot of power.