That's actually a bit insulting. I know he didn't mean to be, but still.

GalCiv I can understand wrt graphical pizzazz, but Sins? Sins is a rather pretty game. Maybe I just like space

Well it's not the pizzazz, but the implication that because they're not as "flashy" as Demigod it's not triple-A quality Don't get me wrong, Demigod looks absolutely fantastic on the SupCom engine, but it's a different beast from both GalCiv and Sins, in both scope and target audience, so it's a bit unfair to make this kind of comparison.

And as I said, I know Tyo/Mike didn't mean it that way, but that's how it reads

My eyes hurt every time I play Sins, No seriously, I mean really hurt.

Get a better monitor.

Or better eyes!

To Lifekatana: Seriously, why do your eyes hurt? The game is gorgeous.

Actually i think he needs a better brain, he just can't process the awesomeness.

Jk

or am I?

I think he's just saying that GPG is spending alot more money, Annatar, not that the other games suck or lack value.  Of course, when you consider that SoaSE cost under $1M to make "alot more money" can be subjective....

Frankly if you are zoomed in enough to appreciate the graphics in Sins, as in Supcom, then you are probably missing something important, (with a few exceptions to time ability usage, etc.). ^^ 

It seems like so far Demigod strikes a balance between strategic zoom and closely watched battles that SoaSE and Supcom don't really have, but early days yet.   

I just hope they remember that Gameplay > Graphics.

Sins didn't have graphical detail? I'm sorry but it most certainly does, while still delivering an excellent game.

Sins did have good graphics but demigods are alot more colorful and detailed. more Pizzazz, more bright, while sins though good graphics alot was dark and usually u didnt really see troops.