Every day I visit tons of website, forums, and social networks for all types of topics, most of which are technology based in some sort of form.  This election cycle has really brought out the best of the liberal “group think” mentality regarding Obama.  On just about every social network Obama is praised as “the one” and any hint of disagreement with his policies or ideals is immediately responded with accusations of racism, or just plain insults.  Anybody who wants to claim that liberals are tolerant to others, please give me a shout because I can quickly debunk that.  Even here on our network of sites, there have been insults tossed at the slightest hint of either supporting McCain, or being against Obama.  I’m certainly not saying conservatives don’t dish out their fair share, but the mentality of liberals has once again bordered on the insane and hateful.

It’s tough being a proud conservative, as I will say what I think regardless of what the group and mob mentality is.  The real shame is so many people, especially bloggers in the tech area, are afraid to do the same.  I have received so many private notes and comments in support of standing up for conservatism, it’s almost crazy.  The best comparison I can make is how conservative actors in Hollywood are often ridiculed or turned down for roles because of their conservative beliefs, and the same mentality is going on right now in the blogosphere.  Conservative bloggers, some of which can be considered A-list are having to remain silent about their thoughts on Obama and McCain, simply because they are afraid of retribution from their employers or just not being able to pickup work from other sites.  It’s a shame, and it’s more telling about liberals than it is anything.

I am a conservative, I don’t like Obama, and I will never let anyone intimidate me because of that. 


Comments (Page 84)
86 PagesFirst 82 83 84 85 86 
on Nov 21, 2008

What is your point?

I was answering your question.

on Nov 21, 2008

The second comes years later, in Armey's own words.

"Quotes" indicate their own words.  Outside of quotes are the writers opinion.

So because Armey (who knows Cheney is STILL in office during this interview) doesn't actually say the "L" word, we now need to debate the meaning of the word LIE here?

Sorry, I am not Bil Clinton, and changing the issue is a popular tactic. Sorry, I wont play that game.  Clearly your opinion of what is stated does not match the facts.  But you are entitled to your opinion.  Just dont claim they are facts.

In what world are the Oil companies making paltry profits?

This world.  Have you seen their 4th quarter profits?  You have!  Shazaam!  WHat are tonights lottery numbers!

Again, you ascribe to me positions and statements that come from your warped view of me, not from anything I've said or supported.

No, you stated you support Kosovo, even though it was not sanctioned by the UN.  WHy?  Because a democrat did it?  So if Obama starts one, you will support it?  You have indicated so.  Your words not mine.  I merely asked the question.  And as you have already indicated you like wars started by democrats, one can assume intelligently what your answer will be.  But you answer it - after the fact.  It is easy to say "I would never!", but the truth is you already have.  You have a pattern.

They don't have to create their own facts. They get their talking points created for them--straight from the Bush White House!

Proof please.  Facts need confirmation.  I doubt you have any though.  As none exist.

But I'll do you the credit of assuming you can separate the real wheat from their chaff.

Well, I did assume you knew the difference between news and commentary programs.  That assumption is apparently incorrect.  But then you do not know what a pacifist is either.

In fact, because he did cite them, they were proven to be FALSE when other journalists, etc. FACT CHECKED him.

A REAL news reporter would have checked them (but I do understand that since there are none, he has no roll models to follow).

Single Instance?  I did not provide a litany of them for brevity sake.  But we even have a more recent one.  Palin and Africa!  Damn, it is hard debating people that are google impaired.

 

on Nov 21, 2008


They've posted records gains for years running now.


Define 'record gains' please.  Margin, ROI, what?  Absolute cash can be misleading.

ANd of course his statement is false on all accounts.  Just hyperbole used to demonize those who produce (as opposed to those who just leech).

In this case, NET INCOME. You can't seriously not know about this...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/01/business/01cnd-exxon.html

Apparently you do not even read your own links.  The "news" story (and I use the term lightly since it does come from the propaganda wing of the left) does not back up your claim.  So I guess you do not know about this.

One year is not "years running".  And that is raw dollars, not the other statistics that indicate high profits.  If you make $100 on a million dollar investment, you are in the wrong business.  But then since you dont know squat about running businesses, I dont expect you to understand that.

on Nov 22, 2008

So if Obama starts one, you will support it? You have indicated so.

Incorrect.  I have never said anything of the kind. So quote me back, or stop lying. 

you have already indicated you like wars started by democrats,

Incorrect AGAIN.  I supported the first Gulf War, which, if you recall, was started by Bush Sr. a REPUBLICAN.  And I don't support the war started by his son.

You have a pattern.

You don't even know me, so how could you know what my position was BEFORE or DURING these conflicts?  Again, assumptions based on your invention of me, not actually me.   I supported action in Kosovo, before, during, and after.  The same for the first gulf war.  While I would have supported the removal of Saddam with some carefully placed cruise missiles, I didn't support invading Iraq the second time.  Not did I support Russia's recent actions, before, during, or after.

They don't have to create their own facts. They get their talking points created for them--straight from the Bush White House!

Proof please. Facts need confirmation. I doubt you have any though. As none exist.

Incorrect AGAIN.  This was a widely covered story, so you can easily Google this and get a hundred links yourself.  But here's a link with the former GOP Bush White House Press Secretary saying IN HIS OWN WORDS what I just told you.  It's a minute or so into the commentary portion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_D08K7Q6hyE

But we even have a more recent one. Palin and Africa! Damn, it is hard debating people that are google impaired.

While the SOURCE reported by FOX NEWS about Palin not knowing Africa was a fictitious adviser's name, the STORY that she didn't know the difference is still accurate and confirmed.  So while the name was wrong, the story was true.

Either way, you just defeated your own point that Fox News is "better than" the rest of the MSM, as they make mistakes too...like human beings do.

on Nov 22, 2008

One year is not "years running". And that is raw dollars, not the other statistics that indicate high profits.

The article is QUOTING Exxon in its own words!  And they said that they posted their greatest record profit this year over their record profit the year before.  That makes it PLURAL.  Either way, the point is made.  Bush's years in office have been very VERY good to his "family business" friends in Texas and Saudi Arabia.

And your "raw dollars" comment is just inexplicable.  Their own words said NET INCOME, which is after ALL expenses, R&D, refining, etc. etc.  To claim I know nothing about business when you don't seem to understand something as simple as what "Net Profit" is a lovely little mistake on your part, isn't it? 

on Nov 22, 2008

Incorrect. I have never said anything of the kind. So quote me back, or stop lying.

Asking a question is a lie?  Newspeak reigns supreme!  SO what words can I use now?  LOve Big Brother!

Incorrect AGAIN. I supported the first Gulf War, which, if you recall, was started by Bush Sr. a REPUBLICAN. And I don't support the war started by his son.

Read the statement again.  I did not say "only".  My statement stands.  ANd you are wrong again.  But since you do support THE gulf war, I am glad you signed on to the removal of Saddam.  Since it had way more international support than bombing a bunch of Serbs.

You don't even know me,

I should have stated a pattern here based upon your writings.  I shortened.  Dont you just hate having to qualify EVERYTHING.  Especially when learning a new language like Newspeak?

Incorrect AGAIN. This was a widely covered story, so you can easily Google this and get a hundred links yourself. But here's a link with the former GOP Bush White House Press Secretary saying IN HIS OWN WORDS what I just told you. It's a minute or so into the commentary portion.

YOu really are not too bright are you?  You post links (like Olberman is any smarter) that prove the opposite of your point!  Indeed, you had better watch it again. For the S-L-O-W Learners - News is N-E-W-S and commentary is O-P-I-N-I-O-N.  LIve it learn it, be it.  Thank you for proving my point.  The only talking points to NEWS comes from the DNC to the MSM.

While the SOURCE reported by FOX NEWS about Palin not knowing Africa was a fictitious adviser's name, the STORY that she didn't know the difference is still accurate and confirmed.

No it is not.  It is a lie, propigated by the liberal media and now trying to be excused away by their willing sycophants.  Dont be a dupe.  YOu blew that one, and are still blowing it.  But then I guess you still think she said she could see Russia from her window.

So far, you have written nothing factual, and only provided links that refute your very points.  WHy?  I thought you are supposed to be smart?

The article is QUOTING Exxon in its own words!

Indeed it has. And it mentioned one year - 2007.  You ASSUMED the rest.  Debating you is like teaching a child, constantly correcting and teaching them how.  Next time you want to make a statement of fact, please check your source to make sure it buttresses your point.

I will give you this - it is easier to prove you wrong when you provide the proof.

BTW:  I never said Fox did not make errors.  Only that they were less biased and more fair than the rest of the MSM.  And so far, no one, least of all you and Olberman (who has the IQ of a squid) has shown any proof otherwise.

on Nov 22, 2008

Especially when learning a new language like Newspeak?

Whole thread is double plus ungood double-think.....

....and a waste of breath....

on Nov 22, 2008

Yeah. It's like two ultrahard robots fighting with soft pillows...

 

Nothing will change afterwards.

on Nov 22, 2008

And so far, no one, least of all you and Olberman (who has the IQ of a squid) has shown any proof otherwise.

While the rest of your post is just the same old insults, denial, hyberbole (a squid, really?!), and semantically misquoting me about the TWO Gulf Wars (as the entire WORLD defines them), this last one made me laugh enough to respond.

Who was correct about Bush LONG before you've (still not) figured it out?  Keith Olbermann has been bashing the Bush White House on it's illegal usurpation of executive power, sabotaging of the US Constitution, violation of the Geneva Conventions, graft of Cheney's "energy policy", etc?

A former sportscaster.  A man who had the balls to call it long before it because fashionable (even by Republicans now!) to do so.

So, based on his track record of words and actions, and his ability to spell and proofread his own material, he's clearly a vastly more informed, educated, and reasoned man than you are.   And therefore, he does indeed get my respect.

But, as I said in my post, I was pointing you to the part of the interview AFTER Olbermann's short commentary...where Bush's own press secretary makes it clear just how "unbiased" Fox News is.  Heaven forbid the truth should challenge your self-reinforcing ideological wall. 

on Nov 22, 2008

Whole thread is double plus ungood double-think.

"War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength."

And I am a thought criminal.

on Nov 22, 2008

Nothing will change afterwards.

Change was already effected. 

on Nov 23, 2008

Yeah. It's like two ultrahard robots fighting with soft pillows...



Nothing will change afterwards.

It is however entertaining. Or what you describe would be.

on Nov 23, 2008

Hmm maybe someone will read my post and create robots that fight with pillows?

on Nov 23, 2008

Hmm maybe someone will read my post and create robots that fight with pillows?

on Nov 23, 2008

Hmm maybe someone will read my post and create robots that fight with pillows?

Or how about a wading pool filled with jello and wrestling?

86 PagesFirst 82 83 84 85 86