What were you thinking?
Published on August 17, 2008 By Island Dog In Democrat

I have no shame and I am proud to admit I am a Conservative American.  However, McCain is obviously not my first choice but I will admit he has a good shot at rolling right over Obama this fall.  After watching some of last nights "forum" I really have to wonder what goes through the heads of democrats in this country.  If they truly want "change", why nominate a candidate with no experience and a very shady background?  I mean seriously, did anybody at the DNC ever take a look at Obama's background?

What we know about Obama:

  • He's a good speaker.
  • He wants "change".
  • He's black.

That's about it folks.

We all know he wants "change", but depending on what state he's in or what the poll's show, that "change" is hard to figure out.  With gas prices topping out at over $4 a gallon, Obama's solution seems to be the same solution for everything across the board.....raise taxes.  Of course his supporters don't realize the implication of that because they are too busy holding hands and chanting "change" whever they go.

What we don't know about Obama:

  • If he's actually eligible to run for President.
  • Why he is hiding his muslim past.
  • Why the media is going to great lengths to cover for Obama.
  • And much, much more.

Now me making note that Obama (or Barry Sotetoro) is black will automatically make me labeled as a racist.  That is the tactic the Obama campaign and the DNC have done from the start, and they think Americans are too stupid to not realize it.  Lets make it known, I don't care what color Barry is, it makes no difference to me.  The only person who has made race an issue in this campaign is Barry himself.  Anyone who disagrees with his policies, or questions his past is labeled as a racist and the media runs with it.  The only issue I have with race in this campaign is Barry's support for people like Wright and Louie, or in other words, the real racists in this election. 

There are now serious questions being raised to if Obama is actually eligible to be President.  Back during the debates, the DNC and media pushed a story that McCain wasn't eligible because he was born in Panama.  The McCain camp fought back this attack and won, but the media hasn't made any mention of the allegations against Obama that his birth certificate is faked, and that his whole background is a fuzzy blur.  Is it true, I don't know, but why doesn't the media and Barry come forward with the truth and put this matter down?

Next, Barry keeps lying about his muslim past.  My problem isn't that he was a muslim, my problem is that he keeps lying to conceal the fact.  For what purpose?  Even his own family in Kenya wonders why he is hiding his past.

Now this "forum" this weekend really proved what I have been saying for months, Obama is nothing more than a huge marketing campaign.  If he is not in front of a teleprompter or has the ability to select the questions given to him, he stumbles....and he stumbles BAD.  McCain blew Obama away and the far left is non to happy about it today.  They are now promoting new stories that talk about how Novembers election is already "rigged" for McCain, and other nonsense that they make up.

The fact is Obama is a horrible candidate for the democrats, and you really have to start asking why the democrats chose Barry.  I often make tongue-in-cheek comments about the intelligence of people voting democrat, but after seeing millions of Americans being fooled to vote for someone with a fake "rock star" image, I have to wonder if my comments are really true.

 


Comments (Page 6)
7 PagesFirst 4 5 6 7 
on Sep 02, 2008

If you truly equate selling military secrets to outsourcing you are truly a sick individual. Thank you for this comment, it tells me that there is no reason to waste my time reading any of the swill that comes from your depraved mind. Don't bother responding, because I won't read it.

I will respond anyway.  If you cant see that selling out your country economically can be the same as militarily than you are as short sighted of a conservative as I have seen.  You should be able to at least admit that it is possible.  Get it man, your giving away good paying jobs to  hundreds of thousands of americans and sending that overseas for people making a buck a day or whatever(much less than americans) all so that you can get an extra yacht or have seven houses.  Again seriously how much is too much for these people You need a red yacht to go with the blue, green and white one you already have?  Ted Guys like you are the reason our country cant move forward, you just dont get it and live a world where the walls constantly keep you in a very small box.  I wish you luck that maybe someone can tear one of those walls down.

on Sep 02, 2008

so that you can get an extra yacht or have seven houses

 

Moose, it's so your kids can have toys, so you can have a motorcycle, a TV, a cellphone.  Get real.

on Sep 03, 2008

Get it man, your giving away good paying jobs to hundreds of thousands of americans and sending that overseas for people making a buck a day or whatever(much less than americans) all so that you can get an extra yacht or have seven houses.

No.  No one is giving anything.  You either earn them or not.  And right now, unskilled labor has decided that they are "entitled" to certain things.  Entitilement only works with a tyrannical style of government.  One we are approaching, but are not there yet.  WHen it arrives, I suggest you look to Zimbabwe to see what will happen.  It is not theoretical.  It is a fact.

on Sep 03, 2008

Mooseplow, because of the friendly gesture that you made on PMs, I'll continue in the discussion with you...

I will respond anyway. If you cant see that selling out your country economically can be the same as militarily than you are as short sighted of a conservative as I have seen. You should be able to at least admit that it is possible. Get it man, your giving away good paying jobs to hundreds of thousands of americans and sending that overseas for people making a buck a day or whatever(much less than americans) all so that you can get an extra yacht or have seven houses. Again seriously how much is too much for these people You need a red yacht to go with the blue, green and white one you already have? Ted Guys like you are the reason our country cant move forward, you just dont get it and live a world where the walls constantly keep you in a very small box. I wish you luck that maybe someone can tear one of those walls down.

So when you buy something that was made in a state other than where you live, are you betraying your state?  If you shop at one store instead of another, are you betraying the workers at the store  you choose not to shop in?

If a company decides to move their factory from (say) Wisconsin to Utah, are they betraying their state?

You seem to reserve the right to decide where you want to shop, but then you would deny that same right to factory owners?

on Sep 03, 2008

The poor don't pay any federal taxes

They actually do - in the form of those increased prices for necessities.  They are taxed, just not directly, which is why liberals prefer that approach.  They can pretend to love the poor while making life more difficult for them and placing more money under their (liberal's ) control.  It's all about control, after all.

on Sep 03, 2008

If a company decides to move their factory from (say) Wisconsin to Utah, are they betraying their state?

In a way yes.  We recently had a scare here in Milwaukee when it was announced that miller and coors were merging for a project and that the HQ moved for sure and they didnt know if they would continue brewing beer here.  I know these things happen Ted it is the nature of business, my point is that when it happens enmasse, it is a deliberate act and it does hurt the nation and many families.  There is a reality to it.  I have friends who have lived that reality, and it wasnt fun.  Shouldnt someone step in to save at least some of these good jobs.  Unfortunately school and advanced degrees are not for everyone.  To them do we just say well tough we dont have any decent jobs for you.  What is the solution then?  Thoughts?

on Sep 03, 2008

No. No one is giving anything. You either earn them or not. And right now, unskilled labor has decided that they are "entitled" to certain things. Entitilement only works with a tyrannical style of government. One we are approaching, but are not there yet. WHen it arrives, I suggest you look to Zimbabwe to see what will happen. It is not theoretical. It is a fact

 

I dont beleive in something for nothing, if we are handing out aid then there should be qaulifications meet to receive that aid, and if it isnt then you dont get it period.  If you are in need help should be there but if your scamming then you get nothing.  My opinion.

on Sep 04, 2008

Mooseplow:

In a way yes.  We recently had a scare here in Milwaukee when it was announced that miller and coors were merging for a project and that the HQ moved for sure and they didnt know if they would continue brewing beer here. 

Excellent example of MY point.  Miller isn't owned by an American company, it has been owned by South African Breweries since 2002.  By your way of thinking, South African Breweries is committing treason against South Africa by allowing the Miller Brewery to stay in Milwaukee.  When South African Breweries decided to keep the brewery in Milwaukee running, those jobs became "outsourced" jobs.

on Sep 04, 2008

I dont beleive in something for nothing, if we are handing out aid then there should be qaulifications meet to receive that aid, and if it isnt then you dont get it period. If you are in need help should be there but if your scamming then you get nothing. My opinion.

The issue had nothing to do with aid.  At least not from a talking point aspect.  But of how to "demand" higher prices for what amounts to the same product.  As I pointed out, you can demand higher prices, but that takes a dictatorial government to enforce it.  IN a free society, prices are going to be competitive, so a CEO will always make more than a ditch digger - because he produces more.

There are 2 situations that demonstrate that raising prices arbitrarily leads to disaster.  One of course is the current Zimbabwe, where the government, in what amounts to a perfect example of socialism and "fairness" rulings, have decimated a country that was once the envy of the continent.

The other occurred 80 years ago - in Germany.  You might want to google the term "hyper inflation".  The root of both of these problems is the same, even if the actions of the government were a bit different. But the result was the same - the destruction of the society.  All for good intentions of course.

on Sep 06, 2008

The issue had nothing to do with aid. At least not from a talking point aspect. But of how to "demand" higher prices for what amounts to the same product. As I pointed out, you can demand higher prices, but that takes a dictatorial government to enforce it. IN a free society, prices are going to be competitive, so a CEO will always make more than a ditch digger - because he produces more.

There are 2 situations that demonstrate that raising prices arbitrarily leads to disaster. One of course is the current Zimbabwe, where the government, in what amounts to a perfect example of socialism and "fairness" rulings, have decimated a country that was once the envy of the continent.

The other occurred 80 years ago - in Germany. You might want to google the term "hyper inflation". The root of both of these problems is the same, even if the actions of the government were a bit different. But the result was the same - the destruction of the society. All for good intentions of course.

 

I dont really disagree with what was said here, again my point being that we will have gaps and rich and poor, but those gaps have to be MORE fair and rich people should be MORE PATRIOTIC about poor people.  I know that I, for example will never make CEO money(and I dont need to, to be happy), but I do want my 45-50k a year to be able to feed, cloth and support my damn family, and guess what, right now I cant.  And I dont live beyond my means.  I have no debt and pay my credit cards every month, but in recent months I barely can.  Its at a cost of our future(families that is).

on Sep 06, 2008

again my point being that we will have gaps and rich and poor, but

We have gaps in intelligence too.  How are you going to make that fair?  Lobotomize the smart?  If you dont see the stupidity of your argument, then I guess you have already volunteered to make things fair in the intelligence department.

on Sep 06, 2008

We have gaps in intelligence too. How are you going to make that fair? Lobotomize the smart? If you dont see the stupidity of your argument, then I guess you have already volunteered to make things fair in the intelligence department.

 

apples and oranges my friend.  We cant do anything about that type of stuff but we can make sure the poor have enough money to feed themselves, and cloth themselves, and maybe be able to go on 1 vacation in their lifetimes, even its only 50 miles from their home.

on Sep 06, 2008

apples and oranges my friend.

No, the same fruit.  It is called life and genes.  You may not think it is fair, but the truth is life is not.  Some people are smarter.  Smart people make more money.  YOu would handicap them so they could not.  That is the fallacy of your argument.  Lobotomies for all.

on Sep 07, 2008

Lobotomies for all.

 

Ok for some lets start with Bush....couldnt help sorry

on Sep 07, 2008

Ok for some lets start with Bush....couldnt help sorry

So, you're saying he's not already had one!?!?  You are dangerously out of step with your comrades, there, Moose.

7 PagesFirst 4 5 6 7