If Hillary manages to wrestle the nomination from Hussein all hell breaks loose... get the microwave popcorn ready

After the convention Barry will be nailed with the video of his wife during her rant, and the allegations that his birth certificate is fake.

OK, I have not done any research on this so I am a bit confused. It is believed that both candidates were born outside the US? I mean in this article it has a link to a dispute of McCians bith certificate and now Obama has a possible fake birth certificate as well? How did we end up with these 2 candidates with such conflicting issues?

Off topic, is it just me or has the "quick reply" box changed looks? And the smileys?

Changed?  I dont see any changes?  Have you been drinking kool-aid?

Lord almighty...

He was born in Hawaii. How the hell does that not make him a natural born citizen? It doesn't, because he is. I'm sorry if you all don't want to hear it, but the facts are the facts.

Concerning him being a so called Muslim or whether or not he is hiding his family and him being raised by a Muslim, oh well.

What does it matter IF he was a Muslim? I'm sorry, I'm not so short sighted or paranoid. I really wouldn't care. Besides that point, it isn't what you were "born" (How can someone be born muslim?), but what you are now. He's Christian, that's all should matter, right?

Seriously, come on... I may not be a supporter of his anymore, but this...obsession/paranoia is ridiculous.

Honestly, I think it is because for most people experience equals corruption and/or incompetence. Also, everyone has a shady background, as far as i know when it comes to that Chicago insider guy, it's been looked into.

First of all, to all of you who complain that Obama was "selected not elected" might I remind you, the only purpose for a primary election is for each party to "select" their nominee.  The party leadership get to set the rules for that selection because, well, the nominee is the party's candidate, not the nation's candidate.

Too many people seem to think that the primaries are there to decide who gets to run for the office of president.  They aren't.  If you want more say in who the party chooses, be more active in your party.

In the end though, Obama was chosen this time for the same reason all democrat nominees have been chosen since at least Carter.. probably further back than that.

Basic rule of presidential election rule #1: The republicans will chose the one "whose turn it is" regardless of any better choices, and the democrats will choose whoever the press chooses, regardless of better choices.

Do a little research into who got the nomination from both parties, check out who they were before they were even considering running.  You'll see that this is true.

 To me, the only real question about his Muslim past is, is he lying about it or not?  If he is, then it is relevant, if not, then (at least to me) it isn't.  Same with his birth certificate.  If it is fake, then it is more than just relevant, it makes him a felon.  If it is real, then yes he was born in the US, and eligible to run.

The accusations against McCain were nothing more than an incompetent press inspired fantasy.  He was born in a US Military hospital to two US citizens.  Some people have a misconception that the US Constitution requires a candidate for president be born on "US Soil" or some other words they conjured up meaning within the confines of the US... but that is wrong.  The applicable part of the US Constitution states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen..."   So, to anyone who thinks it says anything else... get it right before you argue your lack of a point. :~D

It really depends on whom you raise taxes, the wealthiest americans are paying the least in taxes they have paid I know since before carter, but my guess is that it goes back way before that.  I know that during carter the tax rate was 75%, which I agree is way to high.  A better rate might be about 35-40%.  I do know we ask the wealthy to take a bigger portion of the tax burden, but lets face it they can afford it.  And for a party that supposedly speaks so prominently about patriotism isnt this the ultimate in being there for your country other than laying down your life for it?  Funny more rich people than not are conservatives and always paint liberals as non-partriotic, but when it comes to them what do they do that is patriotic?  Do they send their sons and daughters to war?  Nope.  In fact many times they try to buy their way out back when we had the draft.  Do they voluteer to help the government out more with money?  Nope.  In fact they just keep taking and taking more in personal wealth.  Being patriotic is an action, not just words.

I guess you dont know since they are now paying  more than at any time in history.  But dont let facts get in your way of good talking points.

Just remember the yachts genius.

Percentage wise you are wrong my friend and that is what counts....By your logic we are all paying more than at anytime in history for everything.

Under carter wealthiest were paying 76% that came down during reagan and bush to I beleive 35% and under Bush to 33% for top tax bracket.

I check myself on this one the exact number are as follows

Carter Years 70-71%

Reagan Bush(most of the years)28.9%

Clinton years 39.8%

Bush years 33-35%

Still they paying much less now than at most times in our modern history.

Why is "percentage wise" what counts? 

Percentage wise we are all dead.  You can jack the marginal rate up to 100%, but if no one pays it, what have you done?  The proof is in the payments, and the proof is that currently the richest 1% pay the highest percent of all taxes in the past 40 years.  That is the proof. 

So when someone tells you "the rich use to pay" it is a lie.  The tax rate use to be, but the rich did not get that way by being stupid, so they dont pay that rate.

As far as part 2 of your fallacy, just remember the yachts.  So the rich can pay more?  Yea, who is going to hire people to get us out of the recession (or slowdown)?  The bum on the street?  Have you ever gotten a job from a poor person?  tax the money away, and they have no money to invest, which means no jobs, which means no expansion.  So go ahead and kill the golden goose. 

And the Yachts?  The idiots in congress decided to "soak the rich".  and destroyed the livilyhood of thousands of non-rich people.  And the Rich yawned.

It is not a theory.  It is a demonstrated fact.

If you give a rich man a million dollars how much of it do you seriously think will make its way to the bottom people?  I work at a huge world wide company and I can tell you to a tee every person of management will do whatever it takes to lie there way to success and fill their pocket books usually through bonus' for good looking "numbers".  I have caught them time and time again, and have won grievance after grievance.  Those are the facts.  And guess what Even though I win the grievance I still only get a small percentage of what I should get.  So in effect I still lose.

Look at history trickle down economics does not work never has, rich are too greedy its never enough(of course there are some expections as I dont want to be told I said all rich people are bad).