Then again....maybe not
Published on January 8, 2008 By Island Dog In US Domestic

For the past 7 or so years, we have listened to the complaints and whining of the left on just about everything.  Week after week, it's another round of articles that mirror DNC talking points, always trying to blame Bush for something. 

For just a moment, I would like to see a democrat in the White House.  I'd like to take that opportunity to watch democrats try to defend "their" President while bringing up quotes from the past years which shows their total hypocrisy.

Just imagine.....

  • If there is another terrorist attack, we can (without any proof at all) accuse the President (D) of knowing about it and what the heck...even help planning it.
  • If the President ever has to use the military, we can run out and say it's about the oil!
  • When the President raises taxes on business owners and producers, and the economy really goes into a recession, we can blame it on them!
  • We can also accuse the President of "shredding" the Constitution, taking away our civil rights, and taking us into a police state.  How fun will that be?

That really would be a blast, but then I think about all the socialist policies, and pandering to anyone for a vote (including illegals), that I would rather not have those laughs.  But won't it be interesting to see the democrats in a defensive stance?

 


Comments
on Jan 08, 2008

That's the way the game is played.  Have you forgotten the Clinton years?  He didn't get a pass.  It doesn't matter who is in the White House.  It doesn't matter what they do or don't do.  Someone is going to criticize them, whether it be a fair criticism or not. 

I do want a Democrat to win, seriously.  I will most likely be voting Dem. unless some really funky things happen between now and election day. 

Oh and just to stir the pot - it totally was about the oil.  The secrecy of this administration is unbelievable, undemocratic and absolutely unconstitutitonal. 

on Jan 08, 2008
At this point I wouldn't mind a Democrat for President. Not only will it prove how bad some of their ideas are. It will also put the average American in a position of kicking themselves in the butt for wanting "change". Cause rest a sure, change will happen if a Democrat takes the White House. But keep in mind that today's voter is the same one that voted for Bush not once, but twice. Throw in a generation of ignorant young people who will vote for a Presidential candidate based on how cool he is.

My opinion means taking a change at making things worse than they already are. But I guess sometimes things have to get worse before they get better.

on Jan 08, 2008

We had that, it was called "The Clinton Administration" and "The Carter Administration".  In both cases the Republican that followed was blamed for the incompetent foolishness of the Democrat.  In both cases history seemed to begin the day the Republican took office.

 

Clinton inhereted the longest continuous economic expansion in the history of the United States, and passed a recession on to Prs. Bush... but it was "The Bush Recession" according to the incompetent liars in press. 

on Jan 09, 2008
Have you forgotten the Clinton years? He didn't get a pass.
Clinton was blamed for masterminding the Cole, WTC93, and the African embassy bombings? Wow! Learn something new every day.
on Jan 09, 2008
Yeah, the blame Clinton got is nothing in comparison to what Bush has received.  
on Jan 09, 2008
Clinton was blamed for masterminding the Cole, WTC93, and the African embassy bombings? Wow! Learn something new every day.


It's like talking to a wall. I give up. Think what you want. (rolls eyes)
on Jan 09, 2008
It's like talking to a wall. I give up. Think what you want. (rolls eyes)


Well he has a point.  Every President is obviously criticized from the other side, but the accusations and things against Bush are to the point of insanity.




on Jan 10, 2008
It's like talking to a wall. I give up. Think what you want. (rolls eyes)


Sometimes I think the same thing - but I do give the benefit of the doubt.

Perhaps you can explain it to us poor dumb conservatives? Without the theatrics? or is that just a trait of democrat women?