When I reposition a window in Photoshop, it minimizes the window and it won't come back.

Will there be a bug report thread?

Had some weired issues with Outlook 2007. When I would try to reply to an email or start a new email the window for it would not be visible. I could go to the taskbar and see that it had opened a new window for the reply or new mail. On the taskbar preview i right-clicked and selected move then hit my left arrow key. I could see that it was moving a window but that window was not visible.

Had to un-install WindowFX. Simply disabling it would not fix the problem.

It sounds like there was an issue with animations and turning them off and then closing and reopening outlook would have resolved it.

This is not a bug.

When disabled WindowFX is not impacting any applications.

 Consider this more of a request than an actual bug.

I like to keep running processes and services in check. It would be nice if "Disabled"  meant completely unloaded.

Same with Firefox...it won't restore from minimized state. And as a side note, ever since installing WinFX, it takes 21 seconds from the time I right click the desktop to the time I get a context menu.

I agree with reply 22.

If that were true then disabling would have solved the issue, and yes I had restarted outlook after disabling it.

When the app is disabled the app is disabled.  It cannot have any impact on any applications opened after it was disabled.

That sounds unexpected.  WindowFX doesn't do anything with that menu.  Does this continue if you disable the right click menu features in WindowFX?

Just telling you what it did. Disabling the app did NOT solve the problem. Uninstallation solved the problem.

Guess I'll just leave it uninstalled so I have a fully functional PC.

Well this is beta software so if you are not comfortable with beta software when I would always advise only using the final release versions.

However I must repeat what I said earlier.  If the application is disabled (as in you open the app up the the enable button is enabled and the disable button is disabled) then the application is having no impact on other processes.  The processes remaining are simply there to avoid issues caused by the Vista / 7 UAC.

Unfortunately that would require the process to elevate itself in order to disable the processes and likewise elevate to turn itself on.  Generally speaking this isn't exactly user friendly and the processes have been designed to use as little memory as possible.  Throw in the possibility of multiple users who may or may not want the app and you end up needing at least one process at all times - the service.

Thats not to say we will not look into the possibility of it shutting down one of the additional processes if it proves viable without producing a poor user experience.