What's the point?

Indeed, you lost it when you degraded to banality.

HEY, DIPSHITS! MOST OF THE PEOPLE WHO USE TWITTER AND FACEBOOK ARE KIDS!

So you admit that ignorance and stupidity are abundant on the left? How brave of you to accept the truth for once.

The good thing is what you think about me doesn't really matter because "ignorance and stupidity" on the left just got proved by you.

Just look at his name. That is the extent on his imagination.

I guess you have a twitter and facebook page cause otherwise you would not know this if it were true.

You must know very little about these social media sites since they are used by major corporations as means to distribute information to employees and customers alike. But, what can be expected from a person with "infidel" for a forum name and using caps  and name calling to make a point (if this person ever had one anyways).

Yea, just wait a while and they always prove that point.

People.

I don't think Jack Chick is a representative of all christians (or even fundamentalists).

Nor do I think the people running Conservapedia are representative for conservatives or right-wing christians in the U.S.A..

All of these people are a marginal fringe.

Now, why can't you have the same consideration for the liberals?

Conservatives were critical of Bush (as indicated here by conservatives on JU) did the liberal media take notice? Sure, if it suited their agenda. Anything positive or not fitting the agenda was excluded. Take all the consideration you need.

Funny.

I always had the feeling that most U.S. media had an insufferable pro-U.S. and right-wing bias. Including the big television networks.

They took notice, it's just more convenient to redraw the definition of "taking notice" at your leisure to proove your point.

Ultimately, I asked: why do you claim the embarassing marginal liberal fringe represent the whole liberal mentality? There are nuts on our side. There are nuts on your side.

But I don't go around quoting Jack Chick or Phyllis Schlaflis or Fred Phelps and use these quotes to say that you are a band of nuts. Same thing for Timothy McVeigh. Or Terry Nichols.

You confuse reporting subject matter with reporting slants.  The news media is USA centric, but not even an honest liberal would even start to indicate they were conservative or right wing biased.  They do tend to ignore the rest of the world, but are very liberal biased in what reporting they do.

And as for the USA centric, look at it this way.  What does the local news report?  Local news and National news.  So my local news is different than your local news.

What do other countries news report?  USA news and their national news.  So what is the USA supposed to report?  USA news and national news, which is the same in the USA.

Maybe if the rest of the world started ignoring the US, the US news would have something more to report on.

I Think Dr Guy wrote something about it awhile back, if I recall correctly. Something about a big "L" and little "l". Liberals are some of the folks that  are offended when they are called liberal. Never heard of a conservative being offend by being refereed to as such. So it's my belief that liberals in general have not yet come to terms with what they want, or think they want to represent. Consistency is lacking. Are they for or against religion (they do seem to promote Islam while criticizing Christianity), are they for political ethics (they say they are. Remember "draining the swamp"?, news says otherwise), are they serious about the economy (I never seen a poor person spend themselves into prosperity). I could go on and on. Some would say, well conservatives don't have the answers, and they would be correct, but conservatives aren't in full control of the government either.

You must not be watching enough if you haven't got your "tingle" down your leg yet. See it before the ratings plummet, or it goes belly up (Newsweek).

Because they're assholes.

This from the Ban king?  Seems you are thin skinned, yet continue to cast aspersions instead of offering substantive comment.

A small minded person indeed, as well as being indicative of and proof of the question.

I suppose you think this article is constructive.

I guess I am supposed to be told what I think?  Sorry, that only works with mind numbed robotic liberals. I think for myself.  Do you?