Term limits for Congress.
oops
Mhmm, and unfortunately...I don't see that happening. (Blegh, I wish someone would prove me wrong on that, seriously.)
well welll still you all do not get it
there is an answer out there but you all are too blind to see it or you have been so brainwashed so much you can not accept the simple truth
what is this answer to all this well go to youtube.com checkout my channels at jdcriveau and there you will find the answers to all this hogwash you are complaining about
of course some of you are so brainwashed that you may find me amusing or comical but the truth is why do you all idots out there believe that a politician has to be the answers to our problems
OH YEA THE POLITICAL PARTIES HAVE TOLD YOU SO IT MUST BE TRUE ah you are such a fool
so to all you who have a brain and are free thinkers checkout youtube.com jdcriveau and listen to what he is saying
as the rest continue to go on complaining and do nothing
jd
let's see there is already term limits for congress it is or called DO NOT VOTE THE GUY OR GAL BACK INTO OFFICE
oh i forgot you all can not figure that out and let me tell you congress believes that also so you keep voting them in and voting them in and voting them in
MY GOSH HOW DUMB CAN YOU ALL BE and you say i am amusing well if you do not like what congress is doing and you still vote them in NOW THAT IS COMICIAL
well now if you are a free thinker and is looking for answers then go to youtube.com and checkout jdcriveau NOW THERE IS SOMETHING DIFFERENT at leaast jd sees the problem and can fix it
Since you have YET to actually contribute anything to this thread or any other threads, Adventure-Dude BOYCOTs your self promotion (mocks the third person promotions from troll). You come across rather looney.
Why? If someone is great at their job, why force them to stop doing it even when everyone they represent wants them to do it? If people get worse the longer they're doing their job, then since they're elected, the voters can simply vote for someone else. There's no need for some arbitrary limit when the voters get to choose.
Ironically the more you spam in every thread for me to do that, the less likely I (and everyone else) are to actually bother 'checking out jdcrivea'. Especially when in most of your posts you're simply copying and pasting the exact same thing.
Despising spammers knows no politcal lines.
I agree with this, up to a point. While we get what we deserve, for the most part, the incumbents have, in a variety of ways, definitely stacked the deck in their favor as the years have gone by, making it much more difficult to unseat a sitting member. Not impossible, by any means (see Daschle, Tom), but more difficult.
It comes down to a philosophical point for me. I believe 'we the people' should be much more active in governance. We've become politically lazy in many respects, and left the field to a professional class of politicians who inevitably become progressively more concerned with their profession than with us. Some form of term limits would minimize this drift toward elitist governors (generic term), though I readily admit it would be the lazy man's fix.
I don't believe that these people are representing the people that voted them in, but because Americans in general are lazy, and tend to be apathetic, and sheep-like, and will vote for anyone in their aligned party, these people have realized that they can exploit their power, and use it to serve themselves. Hopefully my generation will change this, though, so far, the majority of my generation has only fallen to their knees in worship of the Obamagod, (he uses a BLACKBERRY, and is YOUNG, and has a MYSPACE, OMG!!!!! I SHALL FOREVER BELIEVE EVERYTHING OBAMAGOD SAYS), so I doubt anything beyond the normal two-party bs will happen.
Because of this exploitation, perhaps a term limit should be enacted, if only to save the American people from their own laziness, and apathy...
We have only ourselves to blame.
And in taking forever my post is simply a mirror to Daiwa, haha.