Obama thinks so, but of course, “harsh” to liberals means anything uncomfortable like making someone watch the View or listen to Janeane Garafalo for an hour.  The left says that we can’t torture because we need to be the “moral” leaders in the world, which is funny considering they usually chastise people who talk about being moral.  The right says these interrogations are necessary to save American lives from more terrorism.

What does an Admiral, an intelligence director, think of this?

“High value information came from interrogations in which those methods were used and provided a deeper understanding of the al Qa’ida organization that was attacking this country,” Adm. Dennis C. Blair, the intelligence director, wrote in a memo to his staff last Thursday.

Admiral Blair sent his memo on the same day the administration publicly released secret Bush administration legal memos authorizing the use of interrogation methods that the Obama White House has deemed to be illegal torture. Among other things, the Bush administration memos revealed that two captured Qaeda operatives were subjected to a form of near-drowning known as waterboarding a total of 266 times.

Admiral Blair’s assessment that the interrogation methods did produce important information was deleted from a condensed version of his memo released to the media last Thursday. Also deleted was a line in which he empathized with his predecessors who originally approved some of the harsh tactics after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Interesting that details like this were left out of the media report.  I mean, certainly Obama, the “transparent” President would want all the facts to be known, wouldn’t he?

I mean, he would tell us if waterboarding stopped another terrorist attack, right?

On Tuesday, the CIA confirmed to me that it stands by assertions credited to the agency in this 2005 memo that subjecting KSM to “enhanced techniques” of interrogation—including waterboarding—caused him to reveal information that allowed the U.S. government to stop a planned 9/11-style attack on Los Angeles.


Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Apr 25, 2009

Isn't there something called truth serum that sort of makes torture pointless?

That would be considered torture under the current administration.

on Apr 25, 2009

That would be considered torture under the current administration.

It was considered torture since 1975 with the Church commission.

on Apr 26, 2009

taltamir



Quoting stevendedalus,
reply 3
Isn't there something called truth serum that sort of makes torture pointless?


only on TV.

Just like israel has magic anti rocket forcefields that they just choose not to use.

There is about as many of those two as Hamas satellite-guided rockets that can pinpoint a kindergarden and aim for it kilometers away.

edit: hand-made, off course

on Apr 26, 2009

they put BOMBS in kindergandens... they shoot rockets in the "general direction" of israel, above the border, most hit forests causing forest fires and massive loss of ECOLOGY. A few hit cities or villages, sometimes arab villages.

This isn't wrong enough? just shooting in the "general direction" and let whomever get hit? nobody claimed they had GPS guided rockets which pinpoint kindergandens before, you made it up on the spot to make a jibe at israel. But they are murdering randomly, just shooting rockets over the border.

on Apr 27, 2009

they put BOMBS in kindergandens... they shoot rockets in the "general direction" of israel, above the border, most hit forests causing forest fires and massive loss of ECOLOGY. A few hit cities or villages, sometimes arab villages.

You have it all wrong, only America and its friends do these bad things, Terrorists are freedom fighters and its okay if they murder women and children, I know this because in 30 years of active terrorism no one on the left has ever protested aginst them but they do protest every accident we make as an intentional act.

on Apr 27, 2009

I would say that if a person is driving down the street peppering houses with bullets without any clue on who he is hitting or if he is hitting, is MORE of a crime than him bursting someplace and murdering someone specific. There just absolutely no justification to random murdering where you don't even know who you are murdering (or if you even hit). Palastinians living in israel HAVE been hit too.

Paladin, usually its not "misses" but simply fakes... there are various blogs dedicated to pointing those out... for example in a series of incidents a dead palastinian child being found by a sobbing rescuer is taken from the wreckage of a building hit by an israeli bomb... posted in all the world's newspapers... however some have noticed, and corrorlated the pictures... you see that it is the exact SAME rescue worker holding the EXACT SAME corpse in every picture, and that the corpse has RIGOR MORTIS (meaning it was dead long before)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rigor_mortis

Then there are videos showing the "victims" walking into, and getting out of pose. An example was when the AP posted a picture of "victims" of isreali mortar... except the SAME AP reportor took pictures people walking towards the wreckage, putting on fake blood, and lying down in poses, then getting photographed, then leaving... but the newspaper only published the pictures of the "dead", so he went online and posted the whole collage.

on Apr 27, 2009

Then there are videos showing the "victims" walking into, and getting out of pose. An example was when the AP posted a picture of "victims" of isreali mortar... except the SAME AP reportor took pictures people walking towards the wreckage, putting on fake blood, and lying down in poses, then getting photographed, then leaving... but the newspaper only published the pictures of the "dead", so he went online and posted the whole collage.

My friend you are preaching to the choir, I knew of the instances you wrote of and it was widely published on Foxnews but we all know that they can’t be trusted.

3 Pages1 2 3