The momentum for Windows 7 continues to build, and it seems so far that Microsoft is doing a  good job at redeeming the Windows name after Vista.  Windows 7 is fast, seemingly very stable, application compatibility seems good, and the reaction from the tech community and media is far more favorable than it has been in the past couple of years.

So the technical side of Windows 7 is going pretty well, and we haven’t seen much out of marketing yet, but there have been many discussions online about how much Windows 7 will actually cost consumers.  Some have suggested it should be free, which is quite ridiculous, and others speculate it will be similar to what Windows Vista was.

One of my biggest displeasures with Windows Vista wasn’t so much on the technical side, as it was with the actual price and the lack of license bundles.  With some Vista licenses averaging out around $200, it just wasn’t economically feasible to outfit my entire house with copies of Vista, which I would have liked to have done.  I have roughly 5 PC’s in my house, so give or a take a bit, it could have easily cost over $1000 to get my home setup with Vista. 

Now I certainly don’t expect Windows 7 to be free, but I’m now wondering how Microsoft will set the pricing for new and upgrade purchases.  I really hope it reasonably priced, because going too high will have a real negative impact in my opinion.  I would like to see a simple upgrade from either Vista or XP for $99, with a 3-license family pack for $150.  I think that would be very competitive, and get even more people to upgrade.

What do you think?


Comments (Page 9)
21 PagesFirst 7 8 9 10 11  Last
on Jan 25, 2009

Seriously, where in the world can you honestly say 'I STOLE THIS LEGALLY'?

Erm, these days, China?  Korea (at least back when I was stationed there in '89).

When I was stationed in Korea in '89, if you went to a software shop downtown,
maybe at best, 10% of thier stock was original, packaged software.
All the rest was pirated floppies, MANY were virus-infected.
And this was not a dark backalley place, this was a rather large store on a main street.
And if you DID go in there to buy something, obviously they would know you were a US Soldier,
and would hit on you to bring them original software so they could copy it.
There was no copyright laws in effect in that country at that time, dunno about now.
This was also not limited to software, but also to any other goods,
aka, a Rolex on the street-corner for 40 bucks, Gucci bags for 20 dollars,
35 bucks for an ORIGINAL pair of Nike sneakers, the SAME sneakers costing 125 bucks in the PX.

Back then, we had a choice, buy our games in the PX at "x" dollars,
or go to one of the software shops, and buy it for half the PX price.
Yes, I did buy some of those floppies, but no, I never did give them one of my purchased games.

These days, the only software I buy is my OS, the occasional game,
and software I want, for which I cannot find equivelant freeware,
with the functions I want or need, for example, WindowBlinds or DeskScapes.
If you look around, there's freeware, real freeware, not that 'less-functionality'
or 'fully functional for 30 days' freeware,
for almost EVERYTHING you could ever need...

on Jan 25, 2009

As MS did for MsDos and Win 3.1.....releasing them free.

Where?

Giving them free will at least help students...

They offer students some great, steep discounts. I got Microsoft Office for about $60.

The main difference between vista and windows 7 is a few new apps.

I take it you haven't tried the beta. There are some pretty big UI changes.

GenBlood: I don't think there should be different pricing points for 64 bit and 32 bit versions. That would encourage more people to buy the 32 bit version, and I don't want them to do that. Current versions of Vista don't have different prices for 32 and 64 bit versions, and I see no reason to start doing so.

on Jan 25, 2009

Bebi Bulma
My preference would be:

*Exisiting Vista users- smaller upgrade cost, maybe $50 or so; this would help to redeem Microsoft in the light of how poor of a job they did releasing Vista

*XP users- a much higher cost, since 7 will be a much more improved OS, having the good things of Vista combined with the improvements in 7, too. Maybe no real migration path here, or not much different than an outright purchase?

I think that's a load of crap. Why should we XP users be punished with a higher price because we chose to skip Vista?

100% correct, bebi. And Vista users were their 'guinea pigs'. Why should they pay a price for what is essentially a Vista Service Pack?

Unfortunately, M$ has earned it's rep for incompletely developed products which are then resold as a brand new OS.

on Jan 25, 2009

This is a bit dependent on audio drivers. My motherboard's built-in Realtek sound automatically changes the output when I plug or unplug something, and the drivers give me controls to switch between inputs/outputs.

In addition, I think Windows 7 may have improved it a bit? I'm in Vista currently, so I can't check it.

I can confirm: In Windows 7, the sound device can be selected, and the device properties sheet can be opened directly from the volume mixer.

on Jan 25, 2009

CobraA1

I take it you haven't tried the beta. There are some pretty big UI changes.

Yes I did try it. And yes, there has been a few changes to the UI... WB and WinStep does big UI changes too... So back to what I said... Just a few new apps.

 

on Jan 25, 2009

What Microsoft should do: offer Vista users a cheap upgrade to Windows 7.  Say $50 per.

XP users? or Windows 2000 (or previous) users: $200 per.

And the upgrade should then check and confirm that the user is going from Vista to Windows 7 otherwise the cheap upgrade wouldn't work.

Shock and horror, right?!  Nope.  The idea would be that Microsoft would be rewarding the customers that made the leap to Vista while making the customers that skipped the 'interim' release (Vista) pay nearly full fare.

on Jan 25, 2009

Null point of discussion..........

on Jan 25, 2009

Being punished because I did not buy a new OS that was as bad as WinME is no way to get me to buy the latest and greatest.

If it is not easily within my budget, well, I don't really need it any more than I needed Vista.

on Jan 25, 2009

Moosetek13
Being punished because I did not buy a new OS that was as bad as WinME is no way to get me to buy the latest and greatest.

If it is not easily within my budget, well, I don't really need it any more than I needed Vista.

Agreed.

on Jan 25, 2009

I found compatablity issues that Vista didn't work well with others like 1 or 2yr old programes or games.

It has the habit off slowing down if you don;t stay on top off the stuff you do with the computor. I actually liked the xp verstion better.

Not that it really maters for it seems that every time there is an upgrade the older products I meant 1 or 2yr's old will not work or not suported any more. I use Vista not for compatablity but it came with new laptop and is very propriotary and I don't like the not bakewards compatiblity.

on Jan 25, 2009

IMHO I truly believe that if should be FREE to Vista users

on Jan 25, 2009

i think if you buy W7 you should get both the 32 and 64 bit copies, along with being able to register them as 2 different copies

on Jan 25, 2009

skyzyk
IMHO I truly believe that if should be FREE to Vista users

That is possibly the dumbest statement ever made, and I'm talking 'OF ALL TIME' [No Offense].

on Jan 25, 2009

Null point of discussion..........

Pretty much, no matter that people feel/think, Microsoft is unlikely to change their pricing.

on Jan 25, 2009

Why would I change from vista ultimate at this point? It's just not going to happen, even if all games released in 2010 are Windows 7 only. I'm sorry, but to me Vista works flawlessly and I am not going to spend precious time exchanging it and paying for the process as well. At this point, Vista 7 would have to come up with a "BLOW YOUR MIND" feature for the END USER. Minor stuff about start menu enhancements and software docks - yeah alright, it looks like stuff I'd buy for $10 on impulse.

Don't get me wrong. I am not saying I think MS will sell windows 7 for €50. I am simply saying that unless they come up with really good reasons for me to purchase it, I am simply not their target audience.

 

 

 

21 PagesFirst 7 8 9 10 11  Last