Published on November 1, 2008 By Island Dog In Politics

A republican chairman in Florida passed an e-mail along to others, and now he is being labeled as a “racist” by democrats and their usual followers.  He didn’t write the e-mail, he just forwarded it to people on his e-mail list.

My question is, is this comment racist?

"I see carloads of black Obama supporters coming from the inner city to cast their votes for Obama. This is their chance to get a black president and they seem to care little that he is at minimum, socialist, and probably Marxist in his core beliefs. After all, he is black - no experience or accomplishments - but he is black."

Link


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Nov 03, 2008

(i.e. not implying that all those blacks of "carloads" [as in cargo?]

Said the Jaberwocky.  Yes, any statement not cleared by Big Brother and the Newspeak people is now racist.  And all those evil rich people are so niggardly OMG!  There goes another banned word!

What horse hockey!  I guess saying "Black Hole" is racist too.  Never mind it is DESCRIPTIVE.

Just as the email is. "A car load of indeterminate people....."  Hello 1984 We are here!

on Nov 03, 2008

Not with ya on this one Dr. Guy.  It was a racist statement.

Not sure what's going on with the thread - I can't see the source of the quote you included.

on Nov 04, 2008

Not with ya on this one Dr. Guy. It was a racist statement.

First, just to be clear, I do not see the statement as racist.  Just descriptive.

Second, my post was meant for think alouds stupidity.  Equating car load with cargo is just idiocy, but what we can expect in the next 4 years I guess.

on Nov 04, 2008

Equating car load with cargo is just idiocy

I agree with that.  But the presumption of motive is racist, i.e. based on nothing but skin color.

on Nov 04, 2008

I agree with that. But the presumption of motive is racist, i.e. based on nothing but skin color.

If this were a news story, how would you report it?  Just the statement quoted, not the rest of the diatribe.

on Nov 04, 2008

What 'rest of the diatribe'?

on Nov 06, 2008

What 'rest of the diatribe'?

The rhetoric going along with the quoted part.  I am reading the statement just in itself as that was the quoted part, and trying to figure out how it would be reported in the news if the object was a republican getting support.

on Nov 06, 2008

from a german perspective  that would qualify as racist because it reduces Obama to being black saying he has no other qualities than being black which is not true. It also ignores the fact that blacks always vote overwhelmingly democrat; but then there might be no need to be as sensitive in the USA as we are here because you never had a arier-supremacy dictatorship.

on Nov 06, 2008

from a german perspective that would qualify as racist because it reduces Obama to being black saying he has no other qualities than being black which is not true.

It made no such statement.  It is an assumption on your part.  It was descriptive, without being derogatory.

on Nov 06, 2008

I was refering to that "After all, he is black - no experience or accomplishments - but he is black."

Sorry If I wasn't clear enough about that, never meant to attack you, because you indeed didn't wrote anything like that

on Nov 06, 2008

I'm still trying to understand what part you consider diatribe.  Do you mean ID's lead-in paragraph?

This isn't a 'political party' thing to me.  The comments of the left stereotyping Palin supporters, for instance, are no more acceptable to me than the quoted statement.

2 Pages1 2