The LA Times, a very liberal newspaper, has a copy of a tape of Obama and another terrorist supporter (how surprising) Khalidi.  There is already a $175,000 reward for the tape, and supposedly it's very damaging to Obama.

The LA Times is refusing to release the tape, and the demand for them to release it is quickly growing.  Of course, if this was McCain or Palin, it would never have been released, it would have been placed everywhere, but once again the media is covering for Obama.

We have someone running for President who is an unkonwn.  He has a shady past, with several instances of "missing time" that he will not account for.  We need to know more about this man.  We need to see this video!

 


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Nov 05, 2008

personally, id like to see what tipped everybody off to the tape in the 1st place. sure LA could have denied its existance to protect Obama, but since they didnt, they are getting all kinds of publicity.

on Nov 06, 2008

And when you mean "non-lunatic sites" you're talking about, what, FIXED News?!?

If you think a blog site run by left wingnuts is a news site, then I guess everyone right of Mao is a right wing nut to you.

Get real!

on Nov 07, 2008

If you think a blog site run by left wingnuts is a news site, then I guess everyone right of Mao is a right wing nut to you.

One of the biggest problem with the ideological schism in America right now is that everybody see his own news source as "moderate and true" while he sees the other's as "propaganda". Doc, you can't win this one, nor can he.

on Nov 07, 2008

One of the biggest problem with the ideological schism in America right now is that everybody see his own news source as "moderate and true" while he sees the other's as "propaganda". Doc, you can't win this one, nor can he.

ONly with the wingnuts.  At least here at JU, blog sites are not considered authoratative, especially ones taht only allow lunatics to post.

2 Pages1 2